Timechain Wiki

Principles of Economics - Carl Menger

23 min read

Principles of Economics (Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, 1871) is the founding text of the Austrian School, written by Carl Menger and published in Vienna. The work simultaneously inaugurates the marginalist revolution (alongside Jevons and Walras, 1871-1874) and establishes the distinctive Austrian methodological tradition. It is foundational at three levels for Austrian-Bitcoin work: the subjective theory of value (Bitcoin has no "intrinsic value" because no good does — value comes from human valuation); the canonical treatment of money's emergence through Mengerian salability (the framework Bitcoin's monetization operationalizes); and the methodological individualism grounding Austrian analytical work. For monetary emergence specifically, Menger's later essay On the Origins of Money (1892) is more frequently cited; Principles provides the broader framework — value theory, goods classification, capital theory, time preference — within which the monetary essay sits. The 1981 New York University Press translation by Dingwall and Hoselitz is the standard English version.

Why this source matters

Principles of Economics is load-bearing at multiple levels:

  • Subjective theory of value — value is a relation between human valuers and goods, not an objective property. Bitcoin’s “no intrinsic value” criticism is structurally incoherent within the Mengerian framework: no good has intrinsic value.
  • Classification of goods — distinguishing goods by “order” (first-order goods directly satisfy needs; higher-order goods produce first-order goods) provides analytical infrastructure for capital theory and production economics.
  • Money’s emergence through salability — the framework for how money emerges from barter through gradual convergence on the most-salable goods is the canonical theoretical foundation for Bitcoin’s monetization.
  • Methodological individualism — economic analysis must begin with individual purposive action; the commitment grounds Austrian-Bitcoin analytical work generally.
  • Marginal utility — Menger’s articulation provides the machinery for understanding why agents value Bitcoin (or any good) in specific quantities at specific moments.

The companion essay On the Origins of Money - Carl Menger (1892) extracted the monetary-emergence content for English-speaking audiences and is more frequently cited in contemporary Bitcoin discourse; Principles provides the broader framework within which the monetary essay sits.

Bibliographic details

  • Original title: Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre (German)
  • English title: Principles of Economics
  • Author: Carl Menger (1840-1921)
  • First published: 1871 (Vienna, Wilhelm Braumüller)
  • Standard English translation: 1981, by James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz, published by New York University Press with introduction by Friedrich Hayek. Earlier English translation by Dingwall and Hoselitz first appeared in 1950 (Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press).
  • Length: ~300 pages in modern English editions
  • Genre: Theoretical-economics treatise
  • Original-language status: Continues to be published in German; current standard German edition follows Menger’s first edition with scholarly apparatus

Edition and translation notes

  • The 1950 Dingwall-Hoselitz translation was substantially superseded by the 1981 NYU Press edition with Friedrich Hayek’s introduction
  • The 1981 NYU edition is the standard scholarly English version and is the version most contemporary Austrian-Bitcoin engagement references
  • The German original includes prefaces, methodological essays, and apparatus that some English translations omit
  • Menger’s planned second volume (capital theory, distribution) was never completed and published; the published Principles is volume-one only
  • Various subsequent Austrian thinkers (Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Hülsmann) have written commentaries on Principles that supplement the primary text

Structure of the work

Principles is organized into eight chapters plus methodological introduction. The chapter structure:

Chapter 1: The General Theory of the Good

The foundational chapter establishes Menger’s framework for understanding what makes something a “good”:

  • Goods are means for satisfying human needs
  • Four conditions for something to be a good: (1) a human need exists; (2) the thing has properties that can satisfy the need; (3) human knowledge of the causal connection; (4) command over the thing such that it can actually be used
  • The framework’s implications — anything failing any of the four conditions is not yet a good in Menger’s analytical sense
  • Higher-order goods — goods that produce first-order goods (capital goods); a hierarchy of production
  • Time — production takes time; this introduces the temporal dimension foundational to Austrian capital theory

For Bitcoin specifically: Bitcoin satisfies the four conditions for being a good (humans need monetary services; Bitcoin has cryptographic-economic properties that satisfy this need; knowledge of how to use it has spread; users can command its use). The framework gives Bitcoin’s status as a good a precise theoretical foundation.

Chapter 2: Economy and Economic Goods

Engages the question of when goods become “economic goods” — goods whose available quantity falls short of the want they would satisfy. The chapter:

  • Distinguishes free goods (abundant relative to need) from economic goods (scarce relative to need)
  • Articulates that economic activity emerges from scarcity
  • Develops the analytical framework for understanding economizing behavior

For Bitcoin: Bitcoin’s fixed supply makes it intrinsically scarce relative to potential demand at favorable price conditions — Bitcoin is structurally an economic good, not a free good. The framework underscores why Bitcoin’s hardness matters for its monetary properties.

Chapter 3: The Theory of Value

The pivotal theoretical chapter — Menger’s articulation of the subjective theory of value. Key claims:

  • Value is a relation between human valuers and goods, not an objective property of goods
  • Marginal utility — successive units of a good have decreasing marginal utility as the most-pressing needs are satisfied first
  • Subjective valuation drives all economic phenomena; objective value does not exist in any economically meaningful sense
  • Need rankings — humans rank their needs in importance; goods serving more-important needs have higher marginal utility at given quantities

The chapter is one of the most-consequential single chapters in the history of economics. The subjective-value framework is foundational to:

  • All subsequent Austrian theory
  • The broader marginalist revolution
  • Contemporary mainstream economic theory (with substantial modifications)
  • The Austrian-Bitcoin synthesis

For Bitcoin: the subjective-value framework dissolves the “no intrinsic value” criticism. No good has intrinsic value in the Mengerian framework; value emerges from human valuation of goods serving needs. Bitcoin’s value emerges from humans valuing its monetary services — the same mechanism by which gold’s value emerged historically.

Chapter 4: The Theory of Exchange

Engages the analytical framework for understanding how voluntary exchange works:

  • Both parties to a voluntary exchange must value what they receive more than what they give up — voluntary exchange is mutually beneficial
  • Exchange ratios are determined by marginal-utility considerations of both parties
  • Limits of exchange — exchange continues until marginal utilities equalize across the parties’ positions

The exchange theory provides the foundation for subsequent monetary analysis (money emerges to facilitate exchange) and for understanding Bitcoin-market dynamics.

Chapter 5: The Theory of Price

Engages how prices are determined:

  • Prices are exchange ratios that emerge from voluntary exchange
  • Subjective valuations determine the range within which exchange can occur
  • Specific prices emerge from the structure of buyer-seller competition

The price-theory chapter sets the foundation for understanding why Bitcoin’s price is what it is at any moment — a function of buyer-seller marginal valuations rather than any objective property.

Chapter 6: Use Value and Exchange Value

Engages the distinction between using a good directly to satisfy needs and trading it for other goods:

  • Use value — value when the good is consumed directly
  • Exchange value — value when the good is used to obtain other goods
  • The relationship between the two values
  • Implications for understanding what kinds of goods become commonly-traded

The chapter sets the foundation for the monetary-emergence theory developed in subsequent chapters.

Chapter 7: The Theory of the Commodity

Engages the analytical framework for understanding goods that are traded (commodities):

  • Salability — the degree to which a good can be traded in markets without substantial discount
  • Factors affecting salability — divisibility, durability, transportability, recognizability, scarcity-relative-to-demand
  • The salability hierarchy — some goods are more salable than others; this hierarchy is observable and stable
  • Implications for which goods historically emerged as money

The chapter is the foundational theoretical content for monetary emergence. The salability framework is what makes Menger’s monetary theory distinctive from competing frameworks (chartalism, MMT, etc.).

For Bitcoin: the salability framework provides the canonical theoretical lens for understanding Bitcoin’s monetary emergence. Bitcoin is highly divisible, perfectly recognizable (cryptographic verification), durable (mathematically enforced), transportable (information transfer), and scarce (mathematically enforced) — all factors making it structurally salable.

Chapter 8: The Theory of Money

The chapter directly on monetary emergence. Key content:

  • Money emerges from barter through gradual convergence on the most-salable goods
  • The most-salable goods become increasingly desired specifically for their re-tradability, accelerating their monetary status
  • The emergence is gradual — no single individual decides “let this be money”; it emerges from many individual choices over time
  • The eventual outcome — a single good (or small number of goods) emerges as money across a given community
  • Historical examples — gold and silver are the canonical historical cases; Menger discusses how their emergence as money proceeded

For Bitcoin: this chapter is the canonical theoretical foundation for Bitcoin’s monetization. Bitcoin’s emergence as money follows the Mengerian pattern: gradual adoption driven by superior salability properties relative to alternatives.

The chapter’s content was extracted and refined for English-speaking audiences in Menger’s 1892 essay On the Origins of Money - Carl Menger, which is more frequently cited in contemporary Bitcoin discourse.

Core arguments and distinctive contributions

The subjective theory of value

Menger’s most consequential single contribution. The theory’s components:

  • Value is a relation, not a property — there is no objective economic value inherent in goods
  • Value emerges from human valuers ranking goods according to their capacity to satisfy needs
  • Marginal utility — successive units of a good have decreasing marginal utility
  • Needs ranking — humans rank their various needs in importance
  • Specific valuations — each agent at each moment has specific marginal valuations of available goods

The subjective theory of value displaced classical economics’ labor theories of value (Smith’s, Ricardo’s, Marx’s) and provides the foundation for all subsequent marginalist economic theory.

The subjective theory of value is foundational to Bitcoin as emergent money, Hard money vs fiat money, Origins of money, Stock-to-flow model, and essentially all Bitcoin-economic analysis. The framework dissolves objections that “Bitcoin has no intrinsic value” — no good has intrinsic value.

The salability framework for monetary emergence

Menger’s theory of how money emerges through gradual convergence on the most-salable goods. The framework:

  • Salability = the degree to which a good can be traded in markets without substantial discount
  • Factors increasing salability: divisibility, durability, transportability, recognizability, scarcity-relative-to-demand, broad usefulness
  • Mengerian convergence: traders increasingly demand high-salability goods because they can be re-traded; this creates positive feedback toward high-salability goods becoming money
  • Emergence-not-imposition: money emerges from individual voluntary choices; no central authority decides what is money

The salability framework is foundational to Origins of money, Bitcoin as emergent money, Hard money vs fiat money, Monetization S-curve, Stock-to-flow model, and The Power Law model (which provides the quantitative trajectory for Bitcoin’s Mengerian-salability-driven monetization).

The classification of goods by order

Menger’s framework for distinguishing first-order goods (directly satisfy needs) from higher-order goods (produce first-order goods). The framework:

  • First-order goods — directly consumed; bread, water, clothing
  • Second-order goods — produce first-order goods; flour
  • Higher-order goods — produce lower-order goods; wheat fields, milling equipment
  • Time — production from higher-order to first-order goods takes time
  • Capital structure — the temporal-and-structural pattern of production

The goods-classification framework is foundational for Austrian capital theory and for understanding Bitcoin’s role in the broader economic structure. Bitcoin’s status — first-order good (directly satisfies the need for monetary services) or higher-order good (input to other economic activity) — is a substantive analytical question that the classification framework illuminates.

The methodological individualism foundation

Menger establishes that economic analysis must begin with individual purposive action. The framework:

  • Individuals act — purposeful human action is the foundational analytical unit
  • Aggregates emerge from individual actions; aggregates have no independent causal status
  • Macroeconomic phenomena are reducible to micro foundations
  • Implications for economic methodology — top-down “social aggregate” reasoning is suspect

The methodological-individualism commitment grounds all subsequent Austrian analytical work. For Bitcoin: the framework supports analyzing Bitcoin adoption through individual choices rather than as a top-down social phenomenon.

The marginal utility framework

Menger’s articulation of marginal utility (independently developed by Jevons and Walras around the same time):

  • Marginal utility of successive units of a good decreases as more units are consumed
  • The most-pressing needs are satisfied first; subsequent units satisfy less-pressing needs
  • Specific values emerge from where marginal-utility curves intersect
  • Implications for price theory and exchange theory

The marginal-utility framework is foundational to all subsequent economic theory (Austrian, neoclassical, contemporary mainstream).

The methodological dispute with the German Historical School

Menger’s Principles and his subsequent Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences (1883) engage the German Historical School’s claim that economics is purely historical and inductive rather than theoretical. Menger argued:

  • Universal economic theory is possible — economic relationships derivable from human action have universal applicability
  • Deductive theory complements (rather than is replaced by) historical investigation
  • Pure economic theory has its own methodology distinct from historical research

The methodological dispute (Methodenstreit) established the Austrian school as analytically distinct from the German tradition. The methodological framework grounds why Austrian-Bitcoin theory can make universal claims (about money’s emergence through salability, about hardness mattering, etc.) rather than treating each monetary case as merely historically specific.

Influence and reception

In the marginalist revolution (1870s)

Principles was published in 1871, simultaneously with Jevons’s Theory of Political Economy (1871) and Walras’s Elements of Pure Economics (1874). Together these three works inaugurated the marginalist revolution that displaced classical labor-theory-of-value economics.

The three works developed marginal-utility theory independently. They differ in:

  • Menger’s approach — substantially philosophical and methodological; emphasizes individual purposive action and emergence
  • Jevons’s approach — substantially mathematical; emphasizes utility calculus
  • Walras’s approach — substantially formal; emphasizes general equilibrium

The three streams produced contemporary economics. The Austrian tradition specifically descends from Menger; mainstream neoclassical economics descends from a Walras-Jevons synthesis with substantial subsequent development.

In the Austrian tradition

Principles is the foundational Austrian text. All subsequent Austrian theorists work within or against Menger’s framework:

  • Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk — extended Menger’s capital theory; Capital and Interest
  • Friedrich von Wieser — extended Menger’s value theory; coined “marginal utility”
  • Ludwig von Mises — extended Menger’s framework into systematic economic theory; Human Action, Theory of Money and Credit
  • Friedrich Hayek — extended Menger’s framework into knowledge problem and spontaneous order; wrote introduction to 1981 Principles translation
  • Murray Rothbard — extended Menger’s framework into political theory; Man, Economy, and State
  • Various subsequent Austrians — all working within the Mengerian framework

The Mengerian framework’s persistence across 150+ years of Austrian theory speaks to its theoretical robustness.

In the contemporary Bitcoin community

The Mengerian framework is foundational to the Austrian-Bitcoin synthesis:

  • Saifedean Ammous’s The Bitcoin Standard — engages Mengerian salability framework substantively
  • Vijay Boyapati’s The Bullish Case for Bitcoin — operationalizes Mengerian monetization framework
  • Nick Szabo’s “Shelling Out” — extends Mengerian framework with anthropological detail
  • Various contemporary Bitcoin thinkers — all engage Mengerian framework directly or indirectly

For contemporary Bitcoin discourse, Menger’s framework is operative even when not explicitly cited. The salability framework, subjective-value theory, and emergence-through-individual-choice methodology all trace back to Principles.

In mainstream economics

The marginal-utility framework Menger contributed to is foundational to contemporary mainstream economics. The Austrian methodological commitments (methodological individualism, subjective value, deductive theory) are partially preserved and partially modified in contemporary mainstream theory.

The contemporary mainstream-Austrian relationship is complex: substantial common ground (marginal utility, subjective valuation) plus substantial methodological divergence (Austrian deductive theory vs mainstream empirical-mathematical methodology).

In the broader intellectual landscape

Principles has influence beyond strictly economic theory:

  • Methodological individualism as broader social-science methodology
  • Spontaneous order as conceptual framework (Hayek extended)
  • Subjective value theory as broader philosophical framework
  • Emergence-based explanation in social phenomena generally

The broader intellectual influence supports applying Mengerian frameworks beyond strictly monetary questions — to questions about institution emergence, social-order formation, and information processing in markets.

Counter-arguments and tensions

Mathematical limitations relative to neoclassical theory

The argument: Menger’s framework is substantially philosophical and methodological rather than mathematical. Critics argue this limits its analytical power compared to Walras-Jevons-descended neoclassical theory. Specific quantitative analytical questions are harder to engage within the Mengerian framework.

Response: Real but partially defended. The Mengerian framework’s emphasis on emergence, individual action, and qualitative analytical content reflects methodological choice rather than mathematical limitation. Austrian theorists generally argue the methodological choice produces better analytical content than mathematically-elegant-but-formally-empty mainstream models. The honest reading: Menger’s framework is one analytical approach with strengths and weaknesses; mathematical Walrasian frameworks are another with different strengths and weaknesses.

Empirical engagement is limited

The argument: Menger and the Austrian tradition generally engage less with formal empirical analysis than contemporary mainstream economics. Critics argue this limits the framework’s testability and empirical refinement.

Response: Methodologically deliberate. Menger and the Austrian tradition argue that economic theory is substantially deductive (derivable from the logic of human action) rather than empirically inductive. The methodological commitment is genuine; the framework can be criticized for choosing deductive theory but the choice is principled. Modern Austrian work (Selgin, White, various others) has incorporated empirical analysis substantially.

The capital-theory volume was never completed

The argument: Menger planned a second volume of Principles covering capital theory, distribution, and applied economics. The volume was never completed; the published Principles is volume-one only. Critics argue the framework as published is incomplete in important respects.

Response: Right as factual matter. The incomplete framework was substantially extended by Böhm-Bawerk’s Capital and Interest and subsequent Austrian capital-theory work. The Austrian capital-theory tradition as it stands draws on Menger but extends substantially beyond what Principles contains.

The Mengerian monetary emergence framework’s empirical scope

The argument: Menger’s monetary-emergence framework was developed primarily with reference to historical commodity monies (gold, silver). Contemporary critics from the chartalist and Modern Monetary Theory traditions argue that the framework doesn’t apply to modern fiat monetary systems, where money is created by state fiat rather than emerging through Mengerian salability dynamics.

Response: Substantive theoretical dispute. The Mengerian framework treats fiat money as a derivative phenomenon — fiat regimes operating on top of previously-emerged commodity-money frameworks. The chartalist response argues fiat money is fundamentally different — money is what the state declares; it does not emerge through Mengerian dynamics. The dispute is real and not fully resolved.

For Bitcoin specifically: Bitcoin’s emergence outside state fiat clearly follows Mengerian rather than chartalist dynamics. Bitcoin’s emergence is direct evidence that the Mengerian framework continues to operate when goods with sufficient salability properties become available.

The framework’s contemporary applicability

The argument: Principles was written in 1871 for a specific intellectual context. Critics argue the framework’s contemporary applicability requires substantial adaptation — the 19th-century European economic context differs substantially from contemporary global financial systems.

Response: Partially right at the level of context-specific applications; less right at the level of foundational theory. The subjective theory of value, marginal utility, salability framework, methodological individualism — these foundational components have continued to apply across contemporary economic landscapes. Specific applications (to fiat regimes, to derivative markets, to digital assets like Bitcoin) require adaptation but the foundational framework remains operative.

The translation question

The argument: The 1950 Dingwall-Hoselitz English translation was substantially superseded by the 1981 NYU revision. Critics argue earlier engagements with English-translated Menger may have been working from suboptimal translation; contemporary Bitcoin-Menger engagement should engage the 1981 standard edition specifically.

Response: Right as scholarly recommendation. Contemporary engagement should reference the 1981 NYU Press edition with Hayek’s introduction. The 1950 translation is largely of historical interest; the 1981 edition is the standard scholarly text.

Methodological individualism’s contested scope

The argument: Methodological individualism is one methodological choice among several. Critics from holistic-methodology traditions (institutional economics, various sociological approaches) argue that some economic phenomena are not reducible to individual-action foundations. The framework’s universal applicability is contested.

Response: Substantive theoretical dispute. Menger’s methodological-individualism commitment is genuine and produces specific analytical conclusions. Alternative methodological commitments produce different conclusions. The Austrian tradition continues working within Menger’s framework; other traditions work differently. The honest reading: methodological individualism is one well-developed methodology; alternative methodologies coexist.

How to read this source

Essential chapters

For Bitcoin-focused engagement, the essential chapters are:

  • Chapter 1: The general theory of the good (foundation)
  • Chapter 3: The theory of value (subjective theory of value)
  • Chapter 7: The theory of the commodity (salability framework)
  • Chapter 8: The theory of money (monetary emergence)

These four chapters contain most of the Bitcoin-relevant content. Chapters 2, 4, 5, 6 provide supporting framework.

Chapters that can be skimmed on a first pass

For Bitcoin-focused engagement:

  • Chapter 2 (Economy and Economic Goods) — provides analytical context; relevant but not Bitcoin-foundational
  • Chapter 4 (Exchange) — relevant general framework
  • Chapter 5 (Price) — relevant general framework
  • Chapter 6 (Use Value and Exchange Value) — sets foundation for monetary theory

For systematic engagement:

  1. Read Carl Menger’s thinker page first for biographical and corpus context
  2. Read Chapter 1 of Principles for the foundational good-theory framework
  3. Read Chapter 3 of Principles for the subjective theory of value
  4. Read Chapter 7 of Principles for the salability framework
  5. Read Chapter 8 of Principles for the monetary-emergence theory
  6. Read On the Origins of Money - Carl Menger (1892 essay) for the refined monetary-emergence treatment
  7. Read Saifedean Ammous’s The Bitcoin Standard - Saifedean Ammous for contemporary Bitcoin engagement with the Mengerian framework
  8. Read Vijay Boyapati’s The Bullish Case for Bitcoin - Vijay Boyapati for monetization-framework operationalization
  9. Read Nick Szabo’s Shelling Out - Nick Szabo for anthropological extension of the Mengerian framework

For deeper Austrian engagement:

  1. Read Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk’s Capital and Interest for capital-theory extension
  2. Read Ludwig von Mises’s The Theory of Money and Credit - Ludwig von Mises for monetary-theory extension
  3. Read Ludwig von Mises’s Human Action - Ludwig von Mises for systematic synthesis

Reading time and difficulty

Principles is approximately 300 pages but unusually dense relative to length. The methodological-philosophical content makes it harder reading than contemporary economic texts that have been substantially formalized. Plan multiple readings rather than expecting full absorption on first reading.

The 1981 NYU Press edition with Hayek’s introduction provides substantial supporting context. Reading Hayek’s introduction first orients the framework before engaging Menger directly.

Where to find this source

  • NYU Press 1981 edition with Hayek introduction (recommended; standard scholarly version)
  • Various reprints of the 1981 edition through Mises Institute and other publishers
  • Original German editions through scholarly publishers

Digital and audio

  • Mises Institute provides PDF access to various editions through mises.org
  • Online Library of Liberty provides scholarly editions of various Menger works
  • No notable audiobook editions — the methodological-philosophical content doesn’t translate well to audio

Translations

  • English: 1981 Dingwall-Hoselitz translation (NYU Press) — standard
  • Spanish: Multiple translations available
  • Various other European languages

Online platforms

  • Mises Institute (mises.org) — extensive Menger archive
  • Online Library of Liberty — scholarly editions
  • Various Austrian-economic platforms — supporting commentary

Place in the broader Bitcoin canon

For broader engagement:

Open questions

Questions worth tracking:

  • How does the Mengerian framework engage hyperinflation or major-fiat-regime-change scenarios? Mengerian framework was developed in stable-monetary contexts; major-regime-change scenarios may require framework extension.
  • How does the framework engage stablecoins and central bank digital currencies? New monetary instruments require framework application.
  • What is the appropriate methodological-individualism stance on collective Bitcoin holdings (corporate treasuries, ETFs, sovereign reserves)? The methodology individualism foundations may need engagement with collective-entity holding patterns.
  • How does the Mengerian framework engage Bitcoin’s stage of monetization? Bitcoin’s emergence is mid-process; the framework’s predictions for late-stage Bitcoin monetization deserve continued engagement.
  • What is the appropriate way to integrate Mengerian and behavioral-economic findings? Behavioral economics (Kahneman, Thaler, etc.) has documented systematic departures from rational-agent assumptions; the Mengerian framework’s response is partially developed.
  • How does the framework engage post-quantum threats to Bitcoin? Specific Bitcoin properties depend on cryptographic assumptions; quantum advances could affect framework applications.
  • What is the appropriate framework for engaging long-term Bitcoin scarcity dynamics? As Bitcoin’s monetization matures, the framework’s specific predictions need continued development.

Graph View

Backlinks